ResidencyPulse is where faculty evaluations get submitted, consolidated, and turned into clear performance summaries. It draws on all of your faculty, including the busy and adjunct evaluators who usually fall through, so the picture is complete. Directors see the whole cohort, residents see their own progress, and both happen in real time, alongside the systems you already use.
Every residency program in America collects faculty evaluation data. Almost none of them can see what it's telling them. Evaluations get submitted, boxes get checked, and the data settles into systems built for compliance rather than insight.
So residents are evaluated constantly but rarely told anything. They get little real feedback until a committee meeting where someone reads them a summary they've never seen. And program directors spend the night before that meeting doing by hand what should already be done: pulling months of scattered faculty comments into something coherent.
If your Night Float rotation keeps producing opportunity-for-improvement ratings in Medical Knowledge, that's something you should see early enough to act on. The data is already there. ResidencyPulse turns it into a picture your program can use.
Rotation-specific forms, mapped to the ACGME competency domains, built for mobile. A faculty member finishes one between cases in under five minutes. The same place captures both formal evaluations and quick direct observations, so the lighter feedback that usually evaporates gets recorded too.
Resident and faculty identities are tokenized before anything reaches the AI. From there the model works across every evaluator, domain by domain, and drafts a structured summary. You get one coherent read of months of input instead of a stack of disconnected forms.
The draft is a starting point, not a verdict. The program director edits inline, finalizes, and exports a branded PDF ready to share. Once finalized, the version locks and is captured for the audit trail.
A residency runs on two rhythms: the rotation that just ended, and the semiannual review that decides where a resident stands. ResidencyPulse produces the document for each.
After a block ends, the faculty who worked with that resident have said their piece. ResidencyPulse pulls it together into a short, clear read the resident can actually receive while the rotation is still fresh. The feedback that used to vanish into a form becomes something a resident learns from, every few weeks instead of twice a year.
Twice a year the committee has to decide where each resident stands. ResidencyPulse synthesizes the whole period, domain by domain, across every evaluator, into a structured summary the committee reviews, the director finalizes, and the program keeps as the official record. Hours of compiling, done before anyone sits down.
Dr. Mitchell presents as a resident with a strong foundation in clinical care and professional conduct. Interpersonal communication and procedural patient care are sustained strengths across all six evaluators this period. The CCC should focus developmental attention on Practice-Based Learning and Systems-Based Practice heading into the second year — two evaluators independently noted limited engagement with QI initiatives and care-coordination handoffs that warrant a structured improvement plan for H1 2026–2027.
Twice a year, every program has to commit milestone ratings for each resident. ResidencyPulse gives the committee one place to make those determinations and lock them. Once finalized, a resident's milestone record is captured as it stood that period, so the audit trail is clean and the history doesn't move.
Milestones are tracked as their own record, separate from the narrative summaries. The committee decides the ratings. The platform keeps them honest over time.
The same evaluation data, read as a live picture of the whole program. Performance by PGY year, by rotation, by competency domain, updated as faculty submit. You walk in already knowing where each resident is strong, where someone's slipping, and which rotation keeps producing the same gap.
Most residents never see their evaluation data. They get a number at a meeting and a sentence or two of summary. ResidencyPulse gives every resident their own view of the same data the program sees about them.
A resident logs in and sees their performance by competency domain, the individual evaluations behind it, and who wrote them. They watch their own trajectory move across rotations and across years. When a rotation is underway, they can see how it's going while there's still time to act on it.
This isn't a courtesy view. Feedback a resident can see is feedback a resident can use, and the literature on assessment has said so for years. The program decides what's shared and when. Residents get to learn from it instead of waiting for it.
Each role sees what they need, and nothing they don't.
ResidencyPulse is live with OBGYN residency programs, and founding programs are forming now. Get in early, shape the product, and run on it before your next review cycle.
Request access today